Wouldn't that be nice?
Okay you two are freaking me out. =]
They are in cohoots! They planned this so it appears as if it is imperative that this get implemented!
I noticed the RageGuys have not been posting quite as much... I'm thinking they are working hard on the next release. I would not be surprised if Fashmir and Sweedie are "secret testers" and aware that the code will be closed up tight as vault shortly! They need to get support for their requests now!
hmmmm... Fashmir did not deny his involvement in a plot...
lol. Poor Andy. Dave and Matt are out of the office for the rest of this week, I think, so Andy's working, fielding support, making sure the invisibility cloak stays in place on the ever-elusive Matt, and being the welcome wagon on the forums. I'd imagine 50% of the team gone has something to do with their relative silence. =]
That doesn't mean Sweedie and Fashmir aren't conspiring. =)
Heh. Well as I said elsewhere - even if we dont respond to all the suggestions, we *will* be going through the entire suggestions forum, considering every idea and how it fits in with ArtRage.
Some of the suggestions are already on our 'to do' list. Some are in the 'nice to have if we get time' bin. Some wouldn't fit with an ArtRage product, but could make it to an ArtRage Pro product if we do one.
For inverting paper, we might just make the roughness radial to from +100% to -100%, rather than add another control. Or something like that... 'Innie and Outie'.
AndyRage's mantra for graphics engine code:
"Sure - how hard can it be?"
ohh that sounds good-it would be fun if we could have it for softness too so we could go from barely touching the paper at 0 to gouging at it with our brushes at -100