
Originally Posted by
stevemawmv
'Lucky you!....Good memories and experiences to have DA... I can imagine he had a great sense of humor judging by his photos and was probably one hell of a good teacher and well loved by all of his students over the years ...
Thanks for the links on Fred, it was fun checking out and revisiting all of his work and a real blast recognizing it...We grew up with his artwork, and that's a good memory in itself!
Take care,
Steve
Oh he was definitely beloved by his students. Not only did he have a good, supportive demeanor, but his pupils walked away with genuine skills. His methods were very understandable. And he aimed students in the right direction to other artists of his ilk. And it wasn't uncommon to see people on breaks sharing books about the Pre-Raphaelite and Loomis and soaking it all in. He really fired people up.
One of the main things that made him so extraordinary was that he was really hands on and consistent. So when he would sit down and start fixing your painting or drawing, he basically repeated what he had always said, then showed what he was talking about.
One of the biggies for me was considering the planes of the head. I never learned to think that way per say. I had always been taught about proportions and then render in the features and that usually got me there, but not always. ie. If there was a shadow I would paint it in. But he hammered home the idea of looking at it in terms of planes. And it made enormous sense when you saw him doing it and talking through his process. It provided a strong structure. Some models and lighting did not show everything clearly. But in using that formula, you knew what was there. And you could add to it in ways that were convincing. So no longer was I a slave to a model or a photo what I was looking at. One could thereafter enhance.
There's nothing quite like the feeling when the light suddenly goes on and you 'get it'.
"Not a bit is wasted and the best is yet to come. . ." -- remembered from a dream