Very impressive the range of watercolor effects you have been managing.
How straight is this stuff as a technique and how much is clever manipulation? What I mean is whether or not the painting is direct and uninterrupted or do you find you have to stop and add a texture overlay or whatever? Long ago, before ArtRage, in Photoshop I would scan in black and white drippy and splashy and water color wet into wet marks that I would then import as a layer later to assign it a color(s).
It was in an effort to make my computer stuff look more like it was done traditionally, while keeping the edit-ability for doing variations etc. Was more like working in Illustrator - slow and laborious, but it has its uses.
It worked, but it was very indirect, and it totally lost the spontaneity that makes direct painting expressive and feeling.
I'm sure you do different methods and thus they have their respective qualities of experience. Which technique would you say effects the best balance between getting the right look with the most facile, natural method?
"Not a bit is wasted and the best is yet to come. . ." -- remembered from a dream